Development Communication

Monday, March 10, 2014

Development means development of the bottom 50 percent of a country.
Mohammed Yunus, Founder of the Grameen Bank, Bangaladesh.

Development communication has been defined in several ways by economic development experts, sociologists, and communication experts. The terminology development communication originated in Asia, the definitions given by the communication experts of this region gained currency. Still definitions differ from region to region depending on the definers view of development. Nora Quebral defined development communication as the art and science of human communication applied to the speedy transformation of a country from poverty to a dynamic and social equality and the larger fulfillment of human potential. Development communication, the all-encompassing term, is occasionally very widely defined as "the discipline and practice of communication in the context of developing countries."

Development communication is concerned with the role of communication in social change. Development communication grew out of the field of agricultural communication. The term was coined to include under it apart from agricultural development, other areas of national development such as population, nutrition, health, education, housing and employment etc.Since all these areas require communication input development communication was considered an appropriate term to describe the scope, direction, structure of the discipline.

Srinivas R. Melkote and H. Leslie Steeves states " The second half of 20th century brought a tradition of communication research and practice geared toward Third World development needs, an area that has come to be known as development communication."

In 1950s and 1960s research on communication and development was conducted on third world people and societies for achieving policy objectives of the US government. Third world people were objects to be molded in whatever shape desired by the western policy makers.

Development communication is described as the systematic use of communication in support of national developmet.The individuals who conceived development communication/journalism in 1960s believed that there should be better trained and informed economic specialists among the communicators, since national development depends on economic growth, to cover fully, impartially and simply the numerous problems of developing nations.

Development communication needs and expectations are subjective categories. There are three sets of problem related to it:
  • Behavior orientations with respect to all media (radio, TV, Cinema, press, oral channels)
  • Affective orientations with regard to the major national development and communications expectations, needs and constraints and possibilities.
  • Cognitive orientations with respect to major national development and communication strategies and policies.
The assumption is that future is built as a result of interactions between people and socio-economic and technological possiblilities.Once we gain a deeper understanding of the directions of change, we may define with greater measure of confidence our feasible region of action.

Development communication has to deal with two types of audience:

·         The communicators comprising development bureaucracy, media practitioners and professionals
·         The people-the audience who can be informed and uninformed, educated , semi-literate and literate.

The effectiveness of the development communication depends on the type and kind of audience, image of development bureaucracy and the interpretation of media practitioners which affect the interpretations of communication and its persuasive efficacy.

Wilbur Schramm was one of the first to recognize that communication could play an important role in the national development of the third world countries. He believed that mass media could better the lives of people by supplementing the information resource and exposing people for learning opportunities.

Text Box: Trickle-down theory 
An economic theory which advocates letting businesses flourish, since their profits will ultimately trickle down to lower-income individuals and the rest of the economy.In economics the trickle-down effect is believed to be central to conservative economic theory, despite the fact that, according to laissez-faire economist Thomas Sowell, no conservative economist has ever advocated such a theory.Of course, the validity of this belief depends on one's definition of both "trickle-down" and "conservatism".
Trickle-down theory is promulgated by right-leaning newspapers such as The Wall Street Journal editorial page and libertarian and conservative think-tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute and the Cato Institute. This theory does not say that benefits given to the upper classes will "trickle down" to those below them on the social hierarchy due to the benevolence or generosity of the rich; rather, its proponents maintain this will occur mostly as a result of the normal workings of unfettered markets
Schramm's conceptualization of the interaction between mass communication and development became the focus of many development programmes. Developments in communication were brought about by the economic, social and political evolution and vice-versa. He advocated the use of big and little media or a combination of both according to the development task, the targeted audience and the resources available.
The development communication model that Schramm proposed in the 1960s had limited success in third world countries. Bullet theory of communication and trickle-down development theory did not work. Development scholars in the 1970s and 1980s recognized and agreed with Schramm's assertion that group activity at the village level is important for village development, bottom-up and horizontal communication  among villagers is as important as top-down communication from the central government to the villagers.
The general role of Devcom is to create the human environment necessary for development to succeed. The specific concept of development communication identified it with information, education and communication.
Devcom is purposive, goal-directed, educative and always associated with some programme for desirable planned change. It is action-oriented since it helps people in gaining better control over their environments by the use of appropriate technology for communication.Devcom negotiates to change attitudes towards development rather than to convert and persuade. It either supports a component approach to development programmes as advocated later by the development practitioners and theorists.

Development communicatin(DC) is the study of social change brought about by the application of communication research, theory, and technologies to bring about development. Development is defined as a widely participatory process of social change in a society, intended to bring about both social and material advancement, including greater equality, freedom, and other valued qualities, for the majority of people through their gaining greater control over their environment. For example, DC promotes social changes leading to improved nutritioin, family planning, better health, higher literacy, and improved agricultural production in developing countries by means of more effective communication. The experts seeking to bring about this type of social change are typically different culturally from the people receiving the development assistance, so heterophily is involved. Histories of DC are Mowlana and Wilson's (1990) The Passing of Modernity, Roger's (1976, 1989) reviews, and Schramm's (1964) Mass Media and National Development. The scholarly study of development began in the 1950, about the same time as Intercultural Communication, as nations in Asia, the Middle East, and Africa ended political colonialization by European countries and sought to improve their socioeconomic conditions. The highest priority for these new nations was development, raising incomes and levels of living for rural and urban poor people. (Gudykunst & Mody 10)

Prerequisites of Devcom:
  • Human and localized approach to communication rather than abstract and centralized
  • Credibility and role of communication links for development-both media and interpersonal links
  • Access to communication.

Participatory theories on development criticized the modernization paradigm on the grounds that it promoted a top-down, ethnocentric and paternalistic view of development. They argued that the diffusion model proposed a conception of development associated with a Western vision of progress. Development communication was informed by a theory that “became a science of producing effective messages”. After decades of interventions, the failure to address poverty and other structural problems in the Third World needed to be explained on the faulty theoretical premises of the programs. Any intervention that was focused on improving messages to better reach individuals or only change behavior was, by definition, unable to implement social change.
Development theories also criticized traditional approaches for having been designed and executed in the capital cities by local elites with guidance and direction from foreign specialists. Local people were not involved in preparing and instrumenting development interventions. Interventions basically conceived of local residents as passive receivers of decisions made outside of their communities, and in many cases, instrumented ill-conceived plans to achieve development. Governments decided what was best for agricultural populations, for example, without giving them a sense of ownership in the systems that were introduced.








Text Box: Hypodermic Needle Theory/ Magic Bullet Theory 

Direct influence via mass media 
 
The "hypodermic needle theory" implied mass media had a direct, immediate and powerful effect on its audiences. The mass media in the 1940s and 1950s were perceived as a powerful influence on behavior change.
Several factors contributed to this "strong effects" theory of communication, including:
• The fast rise and popularization of radio and television
• The emergence of the persuasion industries, such as advertising and propaganda
• The Payne Fund studies of the 1930s, which focused on the impact of motion pictures on children, and
• Hitler's monopolization of the mass media during second world war to unify the German public behind the Nazi party 

The theory suggests that the mass media could influence a very large group of people directly and uniformly by ‘shooting’ or ‘injecting’ them with appropriate messages designed to trigger a desired response. 
Both images used to express this theory (a bullet and a needle) suggest a powerful and direct flow of information from the sender to the receiver. The bullet theory graphically suggests that the message is a bullet, fired from the "media gun" into the viewer's "head". With similarly emotive imagery the hypodermic needle model suggests that media messages are injected straight into a passive audience which is immediately influenced by the message. They express the view that the media is a dangerous means of communicating an idea because the receiver or audience is powerless to resist the impact of the message. There is no escape from the effect of the message in these models. The population is seen as a sitting duck. People are seen as passive and are seen as having a lot media material "shot" at them. People end up thinking what they are told because there is no other source of information. 
New assessments that the Magic Bullet Theory was not accurate came out of election studies in "The People's Choice,". The project was conducted during the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1940 to determine voting patterns and the relationship between the media and political behavior. The majority of people remained untouched by the propaganda; interpersonal outlets brought more influence than the media. The effects of the campaign were not all-powerful to where they persuaded helpless audiences uniformly and directly, which is the very definition of what the magic bullet theory does. As focus group testing, questionnaires, and other methods of marketing effectiveness testing came into widespread use; and as more interactive forms of media (e.g.: internet, radio call-in shows, etc.) became available, the magic bullet theory was replaced by a variety of other, more instrumental models, like the two step of flow theory and diffusion of innovations theory.



Development Threshold and Development Gap
Human and localized approach suggests communication efforts tailored to the needs and psychological dispositions of people and the development threshold of people. That means the entrance or the beginning of the development should be as per the local perception.
There is a need to bridge the Communication gap between the technical specialists with expertise in specific areas of knowledge (such as health, agriculture and literacy) and potential users. So that they could utilize such knowledge and its specific applications to improve the performance.

Socio-Economic Benefits Gap
Knowledge Gap
Communication Gap

More and more development theorists and practitioners are being convinced that "development threshold" is significant for development communication. This concept suggests being receptive to development to a certain point. For example, there is a marked difference between the development threshold of rural and urban society, between elites and masses, men and women within the urban and rural society. These differences in the threshold are termed as "development gap". Development gap is identified with socio-economic gap, Knowledge gap and communication gap. Development gap suggests that people in different development thresholds need different development communication handling for effective development. The development-gap hypothesis is that patterns of communication which may lead the have-nots away from the mainstream of development thus creating gap between the haves and have-nots.

Communication Perspective on Development

In the context of development, fundamental purpose of human communication is to understand the reality in order to achieve goals and select other subsequent goals. Thus understanding and mutual understanding is fundamental to the process of communication itself. A circular communication is necessary at all levels with several loops of feedback and feed-forward to arrive at mutual understanding. A development communication model is based on the communication patterns for development discussion information and feedback, about the development programmes, problems and needs and the relationship among these communication links. (Various mass media channels are feasible communication links for the IEC-information, education & communication function of Devcom.)
No national consensus or individual change can take place without dialogue:
a) Within groups of people with homogeneous needs,
b) Between groups of people with different needs, and
c) Between the public and planners (e.g. government agencies, private voluntary organizations) claiming to meet their needs.

This implies horizontal communication within and between groups in which people are organized (e.g. women's groups, caste groups, religious groups).This implies vertical, bottom-up, people-to-planner information flows on needs, priorities, and preferred modes of meeting them. And it also includes top-down, planner-to-people information flows in response to community information they receive. Information has to keep flowing three ways in a never-ending spiral as it were, first horizontally and then up, and then back down, continuously, and on a variety of issues. The dialogue at each loop or circle of the spiral may sometimes it may not. But the spiral-shaped system must keep information flowing constantly if national development is to be broad-based and self-sustaining.

Communications perspective on development defines development as the construction of particulars set of relationships, roles and patterns of actions and communication as the process by which those are created.

The strategy of defining certain human behavior as not communicative orients development of communication strategists and practitioners into unproductive lines of thought and action.

That a great many of actions people perform are caused by social conditions over which people have no control and a great deal of what people do to one another is not the result of conscious, knowledge or choice. Social action always occurs in the context of unacknowledged constraints and unintended consequences.

Analysis of development from communication perspective indicates that many social actions not defined as communication are communication for development efforts. For instance, direct action such as building roads, enacting legislation to break up exploitative linkages and message transmission through mass media and interpersonal chhanels.These three express and reconstitutes the social reality of the actors in Development communication situation.

Communications perspective on development defines communication not as a category of acts but as a perspective from which to look at any given act. Everything that one does or does not do can be looked at as having message value from the communication perspective; human actions are seen as a process by which persons collectively maintain and create social reality by drawing on the resources of their social reality and from the practices in which they are engaged with others. The communication perspective allows interpretative and critical analysis and improved communication.

International development theorists and practitioners have conceptualized development from various perspectives such as:

Social change
Modernization
Progress
Alternations in life-styles

But all the perspectives have encompassed 'growth'-the economic growth, viz industrialization and agrarian growth; social growth, viz structural and value changes.

The perspectives have changed not only due to Paradigmatic changes but also due to global changes in:

Social setting
Economy
Polity (The form or process of government)
Technology
Communications

These perspectives have changed the concept of development, how to do development and why the development successes do not proportionate with the development efforts of the developing countries.

The development issues and sub-issues are directly related to developing countries but they are also the major concerns and involvement of developed countries. Thus development is envisioned as the interdependent efforts of both developing and developed countries. Communication is significant component in how to do development effectively.

0 comments:

Post a Comment