The Mass Society Theory which
emerged during the latter half of 1800,
as a dominant perspective on Western industrial society attributes an
influential but often a negative role to media. It was simply a collection of
contradictory notions – some quite radical and others quite reactionary . The
radical notions were forwarded by revolutionaries who wanted to impose radical
changes in the society, whereas the reactionary motions were forwarded by the
elites (monarchists) who wanted to maintain the old political and social
order.
Early Mass Society Theorists argued
that media are malignant forces that have the power to directly reach,
transform, and corrupt the minds of individuals so that their lives are ruined
and vast social problems are created. Through media influence, people are
atomized, cut off from the civilizing influence of other people or high
culture. Totalitarianism inevitably results as ruthless, power-hungry dictators
seize control of media to promote their ideology.
Over the years, media have been
continually accused of breaking down folk societies (Gemeinschaft)
, and encouraging the development of amoral, weak social institutions
(Gesselschaft).
Initially, mass society theory
gained wide acceptance. But in time people questioned its unqualified
assertions about the media’s power to corrupt and debase individuals. Although
mass society theory has very little support among contemporary mass
communication researchers and theorists, its basic assumptions of a corrupting
media and helpless audience have never been completely disappeared. Attacks on
the pervasive, dysfunctional power of media have persisted and will persist as
long as dominant elites find their power challenged by media.
0 comments:
Post a Comment